Question period should be an effective debate between opposing political views to develop a consensus on policies that would benefit all Canadians. Unfortunately, our question period has eroded into a joke that is very similar to immature hockey banter.
Question period’s normal behavior would not be tolerated in most high schools but has somehow come to represent the Canadian population. John Ivison of The National Post wrote a great article in yesterday’s paper about this issue. Here are some excerpts:
“…the current antics are disturbing –perhaps because all the party leaders have so recently pledged to make Parliament work. On the contrary, the nation’s assembly is guided more than ever by tribal prejudice, at the expense of the general good.
There’s no doubt that the adversarial nature of the House of Commons makes this inevitable to some degree.”
“The rules of Parliament have been drawn up to give the minority a voice and still allow the government to govern. By that technical metric, Parliament is working. But it is scarcely government for the people, by the people.
It seems the only prospect of that antiquated concept returning is a period of stable, majority government. Anyone with any regard for the traditions of the Westminster system should be imploring: Bring it on.”
You can read the full article here.
If question period was ever going to be cooperative, it should be now during this time of economic uncertainty. Useless chatter about unimportant subjects should be kept to a minimum. Call me ignorant but I think our elected representatives should be as constructive as they possibly can while keeping our best interests in mind.Â
The poor attendance, irrelevant ministerial-guided committees, and posturing should be acknowledged and eliminated; this is our government that we elected and pay for.



