National Citizens Coalition Blog

Back to Main listings


Conservatives need to provide meaningful and immediate tax cuts

The National Citizens Coalition says the federal surplus of $14.2 billion is an embarrassment and that the federal government needs to stop feeding at the public trough and provide meaningful and immediate tax cuts for low and middle income Canadians.

“In 2006 Canadians voted for change, they voted for a government that would stop wasting their money and provide financial accountability at the federal level” says NCC president Peter Coleman.  “Instead, we have a government that is running a staggering surplus and is only willing to put at most a measly $30 back in the pockets of hardworking Canadians.”

“Prime Minister Harper should be looking at ways to substantially increase the basic tax exemption level and provide tax cuts to Canada’s middle income families,” says Coleman.  “Boutique tax cuts mean nothing to the average Canadian – and the simple solution here is to provide broad based tax cuts that will see more money in the pockets of Canadians and less money sitting in the coffers of big government.”

We do not need bigger government and more spending, which is tempting when governments run such large surpluses. The federal government should be looking at ways to provide meaningful tax relief for the citizens that are hit the hardest with over taxation.


Comments

Allan Johnson says:

I’m not one to be bashing the government for receiving a surplus, especially when it was generated by richer profits from a commodity boom. How fortunate for the government.

I am also pleased to see all of this excess cash, $14.2 Billion has been used to pay down Canada’s debt. As our debt still represents over 32% of gross domestic product, I feel it is necessary and appropriate that the government continue to focus on reducing our debts. There will never be a better time to pay down our debt. The cost of carrying this debt is a burden we all share and it’s time to be relieved of it so the government can be in a position to significantly reduce our tax burden.

We voted for change and we are experiencing change. (for the better) I do not support more spending, bigger government or any new spending programs. Allan Johnson

submitted on September 28th, 2007 at 2:59 pm

DStone says:

I have to say I agree with Flaherty’s approach of using the surplus to pay down our crippling debt and then passing the interest savings directly onto taxpayers as tax cuts. We need to maintain these surpluses in order to fuel a rapid future debt reduction!

That being said, this is no time to get complacent. The Government still needs to be more agressive about cutting waistfull expenditures and getting out of high spending in Provincial Jurisdictions. The annual increase in tax reductions should be much higher than the “measly $30″ now being planned!

submitted on September 28th, 2007 at 4:15 pm

ravi harrilal says:

Hi:

I see so much wasteful government spending on roads/street car tracks/sidewalks - a way to “account” for our taxes. It angers me alot.

I pay so much taxes while paying a mortgage and bills. I fell that I am being punished for getting an education and getting a decent paying job. Only the poor benifit in Canada - free everything. I don’t like working extra hours because I am basically working for free as the taxes paid are higher as I make more. I am taxed at close to 40 % and not to mention the extra 14% on everything I buy and GST/PST on phone/internet “services.” This represents 54% of my gross salary. This is not including the property taxes of $200/month I pay. This is sad when people do not want to work because of higher taxes. The government takes the money first. They don’t care about your other commitments.

I don’t use health care - only been to the doctor 3 or 4 times in last 10 years.
I walk to work everyday (1.5 kilometers) so I don’t pollute the environment
I don’t drive also

I should get some sort of tax break for these reasons and not to mention the goverment has a surplus of 14 billion. I am really fustrated at this point.

submitted on September 30th, 2007 at 12:07 pm

Tom Steadman says:

I agree with those who find the paydown of debt to be the right use for this surplus. And it is most definitely NOT, as the NCC says, “feeding at the public trough”.

We are the beneficiaries of whatever good our current $450+ BILLION debt delivered. We, not our children, have a responsibility to pay it down.

I say “Keep the next $450 billion in surpluses.” THEN, give me a tax break that will be meaningful.

submitted on October 1st, 2007 at 1:16 pm

Leave a Comment