National Citizens Coalition Blog

Back to Main listings


It is not a photo-op, it’s his job!

Prime Minister Stephen Harper made a surprise visit to Kabul, Afghanistan yesterday to meet with frontline Canadian workers and Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

While visiting our troops, the Prime Minister reaffirmed our government’s support of the thousands of Canadians who put their lives on the line everyday in order to bring prosperity, peace and democracy to a country that has been oppressed for years.

Yet, one would never know this by reading today’s national papers.  The Globe and Mail, National Post and Toronto Star all take aim at the Prime Minister, blasting his visit as nothing more than a photo-op to boost his polling numbers.

What our national media seem to forget every time they mention Afghanistan, is that Canada is there on a UN sanctioned mission. The free speech that our media enjoy and the freedom they have come to expect has a price tag. And that price tag is an obligation to be part of an international community, and to live up to the commitments Canada has made as a part of that community. 

The other thing our media seem to lose sight of is that Stephen Harper is in fact our Prime Minister.  He is the leader of this country and it is his job to stand behind the men and women serving our country.  If it were just a photo-op, wouldn’t the PM find a safer place to visit?


Comments

Paul Dekker says:

Again Mr Harper responds to concerns of the opposition and the people of Canada (some of them) with actions. In this case some believe we are aiding and abetting torture in Afghanistan so Mr Harper went to ensure we weren’t or to find a solution to the problem. What more could we ask of a leader than to be hands on and respond to what is asked?

submitted on May 23rd, 2007 at 12:47 pm

Frank Gue says:

I wonder if the writers of critical letters/article/editorials actually heard what Harper said? “I’m here not because of the polls but because it’s the right thing to do.”

Get used to it. Canadians just aren’t used to politicians that do things that are “the right thing to do”.

F

submitted on May 23rd, 2007 at 2:47 pm

Bob says:

As it always is in this country… scorn what is right and boost the minority goofys that continualy find fault with justice. Just as victims of crime at home are dismissed in deference to the of the criminally depraved.
Where is the leader who will finally say f… you, you yellow liberal air heads. This is how society wants to be, no needs to be governed. And begins by burning the totally flawed “Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. For never has law abiding society been subjected to so harsh a treatment before the courts and justice departments as we are now. If such a person is out there, please make yourself known, Canada is adrift with a stern hand on the tiller.

submitted on May 23rd, 2007 at 10:34 pm

Michael Patrick says:

After reading the newspaper coverage, my first response was to yawn as I realized the reporters were miffed that they were muzzled for security reasons. Of course, their typically juvenile response is to retaliate and criticize Mr. Harper’s trip. I am so glad that the world is changing due to the impact of the internet. More and more people get their news on the internet and the musings of these newspaper hacks are becoming less and less relevant.

submitted on May 24th, 2007 at 8:21 am

Wes Bowers says:

The Right Honourable Stephen Harper is doing an outstanding job of leading this fractious country of ours. I believe that he was in Afghanistan because it is “the right thing to do”. He represents the people of Canada, not the media. Canadians expect the Prime Minister to command our troops to accomplish two objectives in Afghanistan for their government and their people: justice and mercy. Justice for the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, in the form of military action; mercy for the Afghan government and people through the reconstruction and humanitarian aid actions. May our troops achieve success in both those objectives and may God provide protection for them as they go about this honourable business. We shall continue to pray for them in the chatroom at www.militarylives.com

submitted on May 24th, 2007 at 9:39 pm

R. Alexander says:

I agree the National Post article was a little harsh, but it did have some truth to it. I believe the Prime Minister does need to visit the troops, but Don Martin made a valid point that he may not require such an entourage, nor does the CP need to send so many M.P.’s to view the mission. If we really value freedom through less government, we should not want our M.P.’s to spend thousands of dollars making trips of considerable expense to the taxpayer.

submitted on May 26th, 2007 at 12:17 am

Leave a Comment